← ALL COMPARISONS

Katla vs OneTrust

An enterprise privacy suite where cookie consent is one module among DSAR handling, vendor risk and assessments. Pricing is quoted, not published.

Get started freeOneTrust pricing

OneTrust pricing taken from their pricing page, verified . Weight and LCP are our own measurements — how they were taken.

KatlaHEADLESS · AIOneTrustPRIVACY SUITE
DeliveryHeadless, SDK, or hosted bannerHosted banner within a wider suite
Script weight4.9 kB headless171.6 kB
Added LCPNo measurable change+2646 ms
PricingFlat per site, no overageNegotiated annual contract, typically bundled across modules
Free tierScan and policy, no cardNo free tier; a separate free scanner tool is offered

Why teams move.

If cookie consent is the job — not one line item in a privacy programme — a full suite is a lot of platform to carry for it. Katla does consent properly and stops there: you can see the price, start on the free tier, and have a banner live this afternoon without a sales call or a procurement cycle.

Headless

The consent layer, without the UI you did not ask for.

  • Guard-only mode with no bundled interface
  • window.KatlaConsent plus a katla:consent event on every change
  • A React and Next.js SDK with hooks, or plain DOM if you prefer
  • The hosted banner is still one line away when you want it
Speed

5 KB headless, 15 KB with the banner — and it runs before the trackers do.

  • About 5 KB over the wire in headless mode
  • About 15 KB with the full hosted banner and your cookie data
  • Served from a CDN and cached at the edge
  • The guard runs ahead of trackers, so blocking is not a race
AI

Cookies classified and described without you writing a word.

  • Automatic classification of newly discovered cookies
  • Descriptions generated per locale, overridable when you want your own wording
  • Cookie and privacy policies generated from your real scan data
  • An MCP server, so Claude or ChatGPT can audit cookies and query consent for you
Flexibility

One consent layer across everything you run.

  • Script tag, React and Next.js SDK, or a WordPress and WooCommerce plugin
  • A CLI, so onboarding thirty sites is a script rather than an afternoon
  • A full API, and an MCP server on top of it
  • Per-locale policies and descriptions from the same source of truth
Simplicity

A price on the website and a script tag to start.

  • Published pricing — no quote, no call, no procurement cycle
  • Flat per site, per month, with no usage overage charges
  • A free tier that scans and generates a policy without a card
  • One script tag from nothing to a working banner
That's how the cookie crumbles. Except your SEO shouldn't.4.9 kB headless, and no measurable LCP cost.
ONETRUST PRICING

Quote only — no public pricing

Charged on
Negotiated annual contract, typically bundled across modules
Free tier
No free tier; a separate free scanner tool is offered
Katla's pricing →
PlanPriceIncludes
All tiersOn requestPricing is not published; every deal is quoted by sales

From OneTrust's own pricing page, verified .

MIGRATION

Moving from OneTrust.

The two can coexist: keep OneTrust for the modules Katla does not replace, and let Katla own consent on the sites you move across. Only ever run one consent script per page.

  1. Add your domains in Katla and verify them
  2. Run scans to build the cookie inventory
  3. Replace the OneTrust script with Katla’s, or use the SDK
  4. Keep OneTrust for the modules Katla does not replace — the two can coexist
OTHER COMPARISONS
Katla vs CookiebotKatla vs CookieYesKatla vs PandectesOneTrust pricing

Try it on one site.

The free plan scans a domain and generates a policy without a card. Keep OneTrust running while you compare.

Get started free